DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S$. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
BC
Docket No: 09501-13
28duly 2014
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF QR
Ref: {a) 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments
(2) Case summary
(3) Subject's naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a
former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed
enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the
MDF (pregnancy or childbirth} separation code and RE-4 (not
recommended for retention) reentry code issued on 2 May 1994, be
upgraded.
2. The Board, consisting of Mr. 4salman, Mr. Rothlein, and Ms.
Henkel, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
on 23 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined
that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on
the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
finds as follows:
a. Petitioner enlisted on 14 December 1992. She received
nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for being absent without leave on 9
March 1994. On 2 May 1994, she was not recommended for
retention due to pregnancy or childbirth, discharged with an
honorable characterization of service, assigned an MDF
separation code and an RE-4 reentry code.
CONCLUSION:
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the
Board found that Petitioner’s MDF separation code was correctly
assigned due to her pregnancy or childbirth. However, as her
reentry code should be amended from RE-4 to RE-3B
(parenthood/pregnancy/childbirth). In view of the above, the
.Board directs the following corrective action.
RECOMMENDATION:
; a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that
she was assigned an RE-3B (parenthood/pregnancy/childbirth)
reentry code, vice the RE-4 reentry code on 2 May 1994. —
©. That no further relief be granted.
¢c. That a copy of this report of proceedings be filed in her
record,
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c} of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board‘s
proceedings in the above entitled matter.
Crom Arongn
ROBERT D. 4SALMAN , BRIAN J. GHORGE
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulation, Section 723.6(e))}
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
TS Fiat
SALMAN
ROBERT D.
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7821 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a of the United States Navy, filed former enlisted member that the enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, RE-4 reentry code issued on 10 April 1996 be upgraded. The alternative code of RE-38 (Parenthood/Pregnancy/Childbirth) is normally assigned in cases such as this. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that she was assigned a reentry code of RE-3B on.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07126-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. e. In August 1988 Petitioner was administratively processed for separation by reason of pregnancy/childbirth due to her inability to comply with the NFC policy program. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by changing ~ the RE-4 reenlistment code, assigned on 5 August 1988, to RE-3B.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06318-01
6318-01 7 December 2001 From: To: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C.1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's Naval Record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, that her reenlistment code be changed. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, Milner and Pauling 2. reviewed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06341-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 ELP Docket No 6341-01 29 January 2002 From: To: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD 0 Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C.1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's Naval Record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting, in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10755-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that her reenlistment code be changed. Nevertheless, she was administratively processed for separation by reason of parenthood due to her inability to comply with the NFC program. On 23 February 2004 the discharge authority, Navy Personnel Command (NPC), directed a reenlistment code of RE-3B, or a RE-4, if warranted by the service record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 13656-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with Ghd Board requesting that her RE-4 reenlistment code be changed. Since an RE-3B reenlistment code is authorized by regulatory guidance for a Sailor who is separated for this reason, the Board concludes that an RE-3B reenlistment code is more appropriate than the RE-4 reenlistment code now of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by changing the RE-4...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00398-02
1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record From: To : Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy filed an application with this Board requesting that her record be corrected to show that she was separated by reason of hardship vice pregnancy or childbirth. e. The Board is aware that Petitioner is not eligible for the MGIB because she did not complete 30 months of active duty, and there is no provision in the law...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03518-11
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 SIN Docket No; 03518-11 2 February 2012 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Sa Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Pfeiffer, and Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 31 January 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the limited...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00327-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that her RE-4 reenlistment code be changed. Since an RE-3B reenlistment code is authorized by regulatory _ guidance for a Sailor who is separated by reason of .parenthood, the Board concludes that the interest of justice would better be better served by changing Petitioner’s RE-4 reenlistment code to Re-3B rather than the RE-4 now of record. That...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05172-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TIR Docket No: 5172-08 5 February 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OF Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. e. On 6 February 2008 the discharge authority directed separation with a characterization of service warranted her service record and an RE-3B reenlistment code. In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of...